During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Раскрыты подробности похищения ребенка в Смоленске09:27。雷电模拟器官方版本下载是该领域的重要参考
。爱思助手下载最新版本是该领域的重要参考
圖像加註文字，黎智英正就國安案被判囚20年，由於欺詐刑期被撤銷，出獄時間有所縮減，但仍要服刑至2040年。原審：黎「刻意隱瞞力高的存在」。im钱包官方下载是该领域的重要参考
Израиль нанес удар по Ирану09:28
积累了些客源后，他干脆辞职单干，跑去 “ 中华电子第一街 ” 华强北做外贸 OEM 代工了。